Legal Opinion
United States v. Humble
District Court, E.D. Louisiana
Decided June 15, 1989No. Crim. A. 89-77PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER AND REASONS
FELDMAN, District Judge.
Defendant, Tracy Humble, is charged with two counts of violating 18 U.S.C. § 215, receiving commissions for procuring loans as a loan officer of a federally insured financial institution. He moves to dismiss the indictment, alleging that Section 215 is unconstitutionally vague and overbroad.
In 1985, defendant, a loan officer for the Cameron-Brown Mortgage Company, entered into a contract with the G & N and HEW companies. The contract provided that defendant would perform specific financial services to the companies in exchange for a fee. During the…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Grayned v. City of RockfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Broadrick v. OklahomaSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Grayned v. City of RockfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Hoffman Estates v. Flipside, Hoffman Estates, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Kolender v. LawsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- United States v. Seaborn R. WickerCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1991
- United States v. Del Ray Keith ChandlerCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1995
- Allred v. SarovichAppellate Court of Illinois · 1992