Legal Opinion

Chamberlin v. Gallucci

California Court of Appeal

Decided November 25, 1930No. Docket No. 6912PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

BURROUGHS, J., pro tem.

This action was commenced, by the plaintiff to recover the sum of #6,650 alleged to be due him as commissions upon a contract for the sale of furniture. There is also a second count in the complaint in quantum meruit for the same amount as stated in the first cause of action. The contract sued upon is dated November 9, 1925, and is between the plaintiff A. A. Chamberlin, as the party of the first part, and N. Gallucci, an individual doing business under the firm name and style of Universal Manufacturing Co., the party of the second part, and hereinafter referred to as…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Holloway v. McNearCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
  2. Caro v. MatteiCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1918
  3. Jones v. ChalfantCalifornia Supreme Court · 1880

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Harcourt v. Stockton Food Products, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1952

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API