Parkinson Sugar Co. v. Riley
Supreme Court of Kansas
Error from Bourbon District Court. Action to recover for personal injuries. Judgment for plaintiff, at the October term, 1889. The defendant Company comes to this court. The opinion states the facts. The court erred in giving the jury the special instructions asked by the defendant in error. A. T. & S. F. Rid. Co. v. Ledbetter, 34 Kas. 332; Hickey v. Taaffe, 12 N. E. Eep. 290; Warren v. S. K. Rly. Co., 37 Kas. 412; Sanborn v. A. T. & S. F. Rid. Co., 35 id. 298; U. P. Rly.
Read the full summary
Error from Bourbon District Court. Action to recover for personal injuries. Judgment for plaintiff, at the October term, 1889. The defendant Company comes to this court. The opinion states the facts. The court erred in giving the jury the special instructions asked by the defendant in error. A. T. & S. F. Rid. Co. v. Ledbetter, 34 Kas. 332; Hickey v. Taaffe, 12 N. E. Eep. 290; Warren v. S. K. Rly. Co., 37 Kas. 412; Sanborn v. A. T. & S. F. Rid. Co., 35 id. 298; U. P. Rly. Co. v. Estes, 37 id. 729; Rush v. Mo. Pao. Rly. Co., 36 id. 136, 137; Weld v. Mo. Pac. Rly. Co., 39 id. 68, 69; Reading v.…
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Horton, C. J.:
The Parkinson Sugar Company is, and has been for several years last past, a corporation organized and engaged in the manufacture of sugar and syrup from sorghum cane, at its factory near the city of Fort Scott, in this state. On the south side of its factory building, and attached thereto, the company has a trough or carrier, through which runs an endless chain, used to convey the stalks of sorghum cane into the building, to be subjected to the process of manufacture. This carrier extends south from the building, and is about 150 feet in…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Ryan v. . FowlerNew York Court of Appeals · 1862
- Morrow v. County Commissioners of Saline CountySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1879
- Fowler v. HoffmanMichigan Supreme Court · 1875
- City of Wyandotte v. GibsonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1881
- Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fé Railroad v. HoltSupreme Court of Kansas · 1883
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Doyle v. Fitchburg RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1894
- Stevens v. Allis-Chalmers Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1940
- Roberts v. Missouri, Kansas & Texas Railway Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1916
- Tecza v. Sulzberger & Sons Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1914
- Sedlock v. Carr Coal Mining & Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1916
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.