Legal Opinion
National Labor Relations Board v. Pesante
District Court, S.D. California
Decided February 17, 1954No. 16030PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HALL, District Judge.
The National'Labor Relations Board seeks an order requiring obedience to 30 subpoenas issued in connection with a “representation proceeding” before it under Section 9 (a, c) of the Taft-Hartley Act, 29 U.S.C.A. § 159.
On January 27, 1954, I signed an order for judgment for the plaintiff overruling the objections of the defendants. The basis of the order was that the petition to the Board to revoke the subpoena had not been filed within the five days required by Section 11 of the Taft-Hartley Act, 29 U.S.C.A. § 161. On motion to vacate, attention was directed to provisions…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Fleming v. Mohawk Wrecking & Lumber Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Cudahy Packing Co. v. HollandSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Evans v. International Typographical UnionDistrict Court, S.D. Indiana · 1948
- National Labor Relations Board v. Anchor Rome Mills, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1952
- Jackson Packing Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1953
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Lewis v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- National Labor Relations Board Ex Rel. Kohler Co. v. GunacaDistrict Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 1955
- National Labor Relations Board v. D. B. LewisCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1957
- National Labor Relations Board v. Duval Jewelry Company of Miami, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1957
- National Labor Relations Board v. LewisCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1957
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.