Citizens Railway & Light Co. v. Forepaugh
Supreme Court of Iowa
Appeal from Muscatine District Court. — Hon. J. W. Bollinger, Judge. Action for damages resulted in a judgment for defendant. Tbe plaintiff appeals.
1Opinion of the CourtLadd, J.
One of the plaintiff’s street car lines extends along the center of East Second Street, in Muscatine, and the intersecting street known as Park Avenue. On the 20th of June, 1906, the three trains carrying defendant’s wagons,' animals, tent, and other materials essential to the public exhibition of * a circus and menagerie stopped and were unloaded at the railway crossing on East Second Street. The most direct route from there to the show ground to the east was on this street, level for a block and one-half to Mud Creek bridge, then upgrade nearly four blocks to the top of East Hill, and level…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- San Antonio Rapid Transit Street Railway Co. v. LimburgerTexas Supreme Court · 1895
- Railway Co. v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1889
- Fitts v. Cream City RailroadWisconsin Supreme Court · 1884
- Groves v. Louisville Ry. Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1900
- Schild v. Central Park, North & East River RailroadNew York Court of Appeals · 1892
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Asmus v. United Railways Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1911
- Lane v. Inter-Urban Railway Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1921