Bartlett Springs Co. v. Standard Box Co.
California Court of Appeal
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtKerrigan, J.
This is an action for damages for breach of contract. Plaintiff recovered judgment in the amount demanded. A motion for a new trial was made by the defendant, which was denied, and it is from the order denying such motion that this appeal is taken.
On March 5, 1906, the parties to this action entered into an agreement, by the terms of which the defendant was to sell and the plaintiff was to purchase certain kinds of wooden boxes to the entire extent of plaintiff’s demand for the period of one year from the date of the contract. The market price of boxes increased, and the defendant only…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- McCaw Manufacturing Co. v. Felder & RountreeSupreme Court of Georgia · 1902
- National Furnace Co. v. Keystone Manufacturing Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1884
- Hoffman v. MaffioliWisconsin Supreme Court · 1899
- E. G. Dailey Co. v. Clark Can Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1901
- Ames-Brooks Co. v. Ætna InsuranceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1901
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Grand Prairie Gravel Co. v. Joe B. Wills Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1916
- El Rio Oils Ltd. v. Pacific Coast Asphalt Co.California Court of Appeal · 1949
- Kane v. Chrysler CorporationDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 1948
- Fisher v. ParsonsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963
- Tuck v. GudnasonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1936
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.