Legal Opinion
Dudycz v. City of Chicago
Appellate Court of Illinois
Decided November 16, 1990No. 1-89-0318PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Murray
Walter Dudycz (plaintiff) appeals the dismissal of his third-amended complaint against the City of Chicago and a number of its officials. We affirm.
Plaintiff, a Chicago police officer, was elected to the Illinois State Senate in November 1984. After his election he maintained his position with the Chicago police department until February 1985, at which time he requested a leave of absence from active duty. He made the request allegedly because he was ordered to do so by his commanding officer since police department policy did not allow him to continue on active duty while serving as a State…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Cleveland Board of Education v. LoudermillSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Bishop v. WoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Snowden v. HughesSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Hinthorn v. Roland's of Bloomington, Inc.Illinois Supreme Court · 1988
- Dineen v. City of ChicagoIllinois Supreme Court · 1988
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Zimmerman v. Buchheit of Sparta, Inc.Illinois Supreme Court · 1994
- Davis v. Times Mirror Magazines, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1998
- Barbara Propst and Franklin M. Propst v. Donald L. Bitzer, Morton W. Weir, Judith S. Liebman, and Robert M. BerdahlCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1994
- Corluka v. Bridgford Foods of Illinois, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1996
- Estate of Strocchia v. City of ChicagoAppellate Court of Illinois · 1996
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.