Legal Opinion

Getter v. Getter

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided March 7, 1925No. 25,798PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Burch, J.:

The action was one for partition of real estate. Plaintiff claimed under the statute of descents and distributions, as widow of the deceased owner, David T. Getter, who left a will to which *151she had not consented. The defense was that she had executed an antenuptial contract which barred her claim. A demurrer to the answer was sustained and the executor and devisee appeal.

The antenuptial contract reads as follows:

“This Contract, Made and entered into between David T. Getter, of the first part, and Lonie Catrow, of the second part, this 30th…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Hafer v. HaferSupreme Court of Kansas · 1885
  2. Rouse v. RouseSupreme Court of Kansas · 1907

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. McVicar v. McVicarSupreme Court of Kansas · 1929
  2. Bemarkt v. ProutySupreme Court of Kansas · 1931
  3. In Re Oppenheimer's EstateMontana Supreme Court · 1925
  4. In Re Estate of JohnsonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1950
  5. Sanger v. SangerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1931

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API