Legal Opinion

Moses v. State

Mississippi Supreme Court

Decided October 15, 1887PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Appeal from the Circuit Court of Yazoo County. Hon.- T. J. Wharton, Judge. In 1883, Richardson & May, a firm of cotton factors doing business in New Orleans, La., as agents of Mrs. Mary McConnell, a resident of Georgia, applied to the Sun Mutual Insurance Company, a corporation organized under the laws of-Louisiana, for the insurance of certain property situated in Yazoo ■county, Mississippi, against loss by fire.

Read the full summary

Appeal from the Circuit Court of Yazoo County. Hon.- T. J. Wharton, Judge. In 1883, Richardson & May, a firm of cotton factors doing business in New Orleans, La., as agents of Mrs. Mary McConnell, a resident of Georgia, applied to the Sun Mutual Insurance Company, a corporation organized under the laws of-Louisiana, for the insurance of certain property situated in Yazoo ■county, Mississippi, against loss by fire. The insurance was issued and continued in force until 1885, when the property was destroyed by fire. Thereupon, Alexf Moses, as the representative of the “ Sun ” Company, went to…

1Opinion of the Court

Campbell J.,

delivered the opinion of the court.

The manifest purpose of sections 1085 et seq. was to preclude the performance of any act in this State pertaining to the business of insurance by any foreign insurance company which has not complied with the laws of the State.

As the State may prohibit a foreign insurance company from doing business within its limits as held in Paul v. Virginia, 8 Wall. 169, it must have the right to make its prohibition effective by penal enactments as contained in the sections mentioned.'

Affirmed.

2Cited by2 opinions

  1. Swing v. BristerMississippi Supreme Court · 1905
  2. Cowan v. London Assurance Corp.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1895

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API