Legal Opinion
Bhaya v. Westinghouse Electric Corp.
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided December 28, 1990No. 89-2063PublishedCited by 39 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
ALITO, Circuit Judge:
This is an appeal from a final judgment following-a jury verdict in favor of Westinghouse Electric Corporation (“Westinghouse”) in a suit by five former Westinghouse engineers under the Age Discrimination in Employment Act (“ADEA”), 29 U.S.C. § 621 et seq. The plaintiffs contend that the district court erred in granting Westinghouse’s motion for a new trial, in excluding certain evidence at the second trial, and in refusing to give a supplemental jury instruction at the second trial. We will affirm.
I
The background of this case is set out in some detail…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Allied Chemical Corp. v. Daiflon, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Cone v. West Virginia Pulp & Paper Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1947
- United States v. Francis P. Long, A/K/A "Red", John Hackett, A/K/A "Jack"Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1978
- Francis J. McQueeney v. Wilmington Trust Company, Trustee, and Anndep Steamship CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1985
- Savarese v. AgrissCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1989
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by39 opinions
- James West v. Philadelphia Electric CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1995
- State v. Eighth Judicial District Court ex rel. County of ClarkNevada Supreme Court · 2011
- Lepage's Incorporated v. 3m (Minnesota Mining And Manufacturing Company)Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2003
- William P. Becker v. Arco Chemical Company, in No. 98-1636 William P. Becker v. Arco Chemical Company, William P. Becker, in No. 98-1888Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2000
- Ponzini v. PrimeCare Medical, Inc.District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2017
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.