Legal Opinion

Klettke v. C. & J. Commercial Driveaway

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided June 2, 1930No. Docket No. 125, Calendar No. 34,774PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFead, J.

This is certiorari to an award of the department of labor and industry, granting compensation to the widow of Henry Klettke. Defendant C. & J. Commercial Driveaway, Inc., is engaged in driving automobiles from the factory to points of delivery. Decedent Henry Klettke was employed as a foreman, with supervision over the drivers. He superintended a driveaway of automobiles from Lansing to Indianapolis. He and the men attended the automobile races at Indianapolis on May 30th. Some of them started back to Lansing that afternoon in a car provided by defendant. There was not room in the car for…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Crane v. Leonard, Crossette & RileyMichigan Supreme Court · 1921
  2. Industrial Commission v. Aetna Life Insurance CompanySupreme Court of Colorado · 1918
  3. Widman v. Murray Corp. of AmericaMichigan Supreme Court · 1929
  4. Aske v. W. E. Wood Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1929
  5. Hulswit v. Escanaba Manufacturing Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1922

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Murdoch v. Humes SwanstromIdaho Supreme Court · 1931
  2. Roberts v. I. X. L. Glass Corp.Michigan Supreme Court · 1932
  3. Hall v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1936
  4. Columbia Casualty Co. v. KlettkeMichigan Supreme Court · 1932
  5. Fawcett v. AthertonMichigan Supreme Court · 1941

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API