Legal Opinion

Hulswit v. Escanaba Manufacturing Co.

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided June 5, 1922No. Docket No. 107PublishedCited by 12 opinions

Certiorari to Department of Labor and Industry. Esther C. Hulswit and others presented their claim against the Escanaba Manufacturing Company for the accidental death of their decedent in defendant’s employ. From an order awarding compensation, defendant brings certiorari.

1Opinion of the CourtBird, J.

Defendant is a manufacturer of wooden wares in the city of Escanaba. C. Fred Hulswit was employed by defendant in the fall of 1918 to sell its wares. A part of his territory lay in Michigan and a part in Indiana. In January, 1919, he made a new contract with defendant to go to the west coast and represent defendant in the States of California, Oregon, and Washington. In pursuance of this contract he went to those States and began his work. Upon at least a portion of his territory he used an automobile. While so traveling in November, 1920, he met with an accident in which he lost his life.…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Crane v. Leonard, Crossette & RileyMichigan Supreme Court · 1921

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Karaczewski v. Farbman Stein & Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 2007
  2. Biddy v. Blue Bird Air ServiceIllinois Supreme Court · 1940
  3. Roberts v. I. X. L. Glass Corp.Michigan Supreme Court · 1932
  4. Degray v. Miller Bros. Con. Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1934
  5. Hopkins v. Matchless Metal Polish Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1923

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API