Legal Opinion

State v. Dye

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided October 19, 2010No. COA09-1574PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

STROUD, Judge.

Defendant was convicted by a jury of two counts of statutory rape, two counts of incest of a child, second degree rape, and incest. Defendant appeals, arguing the trial court erred by allowing certain testimony from an expert witness and in failing to grant defendant’s motion for a mistrial. For the following reasons, we find no error.

I. Background

The State’s evidence tended to show that in 1993 Ms. Jane Smith 1 and defendant began a romantic relationship; at the time Ms. Smith and defendant began dating, Ms. Smith’s daughter, Mary, was four years old. In 1994, Ms. Smith and…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. State v. SmithSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1987
  2. State v. BurginSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1985
  3. Reep v. BeckSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2005
  4. State v. CunninghamCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2008
  5. State v. CurryCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2010

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State v. HesterCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2011
  2. State v. NoblesCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2025
  3. State v. ThompsonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API