State v. Dye
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
STROUD, Judge.
Defendant was convicted by a jury of two counts of statutory rape, two counts of incest of a child, second degree rape, and incest. Defendant appeals, arguing the trial court erred by allowing certain testimony from an expert witness and in failing to grant defendant’s motion for a mistrial. For the following reasons, we find no error.
I. Background
The State’s evidence tended to show that in 1993 Ms. Jane Smith 1 and defendant began a romantic relationship; at the time Ms. Smith and defendant began dating, Ms. Smith’s daughter, Mary, was four years old. In 1994, Ms. Smith and…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- State v. SmithSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1987
- State v. BurginSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1985
- Reep v. BeckSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2005
- State v. CunninghamCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2008
- State v. CurryCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2010
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- State v. HesterCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2011
- State v. NoblesCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2025
- State v. ThompsonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2024