Legal Opinion
Appeal of Campaign for Ratepayers' Rights
Supreme Court of New Hampshire
Decided July 21, 2011No. 2010-121PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHicks, J.
The appellants, Campaign for Ratepayers’ Rights, Conservation Law Foundation, Freedom Logistics, LLC, Halifax-Ameriean Energy Co., LLC, TransCanada Hydro Northeast, Inc., Union of Concerned Scientists and Jackson Perry, appeal orders of the New Hampshire Site Evaluation Committee (the committee) denying their motion for declaratory judgment. We vacate because the committee lacked subject matter jurisdiction.
The record supports the following facts. This case involves the installation of a wet flue gas desulphurization system (also known as a “scrubber”) at Merrimack Station, an electricity…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Figueroa v. C & S Ball BearingSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1996
- Roberts v. General Motors Corp.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1994
- Appeal of RichardsSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1991
- Appeal of Town of BethlehemSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2006
- Kimball v. New Hampshire Board of AccountancySupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1978
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Union Leader Corp. v. New Hampshire Retirement SystemSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2011
- Appeal of Raymond CoverSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2016
- William L. O'Brien v. New Hampshire Democratic Party & a.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 2014
- Appeal of Sandra Brown, DVMSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2018
- Richard v. GovernorSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2024
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.