Legal Opinion

Espinoza v. City of Seattle

District Court, W.D. Washington

Decided May 1, 2020No. 2:17-cv-01709Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON 8 AT SEATTLE 9 10 DANIEL ESPINOZA, CASE NO. C17-1709JLR 11 Plaintiff, ORDER ON DEFENDANTS’ v. DAUBERT MOTION AND 12 MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT CITY OF SEATTLE, et al., 13 Defendants. 14 15 I. INTRODUCTION 16 Before the court are (1) Defendants City of Seattle and Lieutenant Thomas 17 Mahaffey’s (collectively, “Defendants”) motion to exclude Plaintiff Daniel Espinoza’s 18 damages expert Erick West (MTE (Dkt. # 73)) and (2) Defendants’ motion for summary 19 judgment (MSJ (Dkt. # 75)). Mr. Espinoza opposes both motions.…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  5. Scott v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 2007

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API