Legal Opinion

Matter of Heintz

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided September 27, 1976No. 828, CA 6349PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*937SLOAN, S. J.

This is an appeal from a determination that appellant is a mentally ill person. The basic assignment of error is the lack of sufficient evidence to justify the finding of mental illness.

The court did not find appellant to be dangerous to herself or others, ORS 426.005(2)(a). The court did find that she was unable to provide for her basic needs and is not receiving such care as is necessary for her health and safety. ORS 426.005(2)(b).

The evidence consisted of the testimony of appellant’s mother who, with her husband, had executed the affidavit which initiated these proceedings,…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. O'Connor v. DonaldsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  2. O'Neill v. O'NeillOregon Supreme Court · 1976

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Matter of JepsonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1980
  2. Matter of TroupeCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1978
  3. State v. DaultonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1977
  4. State v. HaskellCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1976
  5. State v. PaulCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1977

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API