Legal Opinion

United States v. Sischo

District Court, W.D. Washington

Decided November 22, 1919No. 4038PublishedCited by 14 opinions

At Raw. Action by the United. States against .Wesley L. Sischo.

1Opinion of the Court

CUSHMAN, District Judge.

The defendant, Wesley L. Sischo, was tried for a violation of Act Feb. 9, 1909, as amended January 17, 1914 (section 8801, Comp. St.), convicted, sentenced, and is now serving a term of years in the penitentiary for smuggling opium prepared for smoking from British Columbia into the United States. The opium and the boat in which it was smuggled have been forfeited. The Customs Department under section 2809, R. S. (section 5506, Comp. St.), imposed a penalty of $6,400 upon the defendant, and this suit was begun under section 15 pf Act June 22, 1874 (section 5803, Comp.…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. The ConquerorSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
  2. Hipolite Egg Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1911
  3. United States v. BabbitSupreme Court of the United States · 1862
  4. Groves v. SlaughterSupreme Court of the United States · 1841
  5. State v. O'NeilSupreme Court of Vermont · 1885

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. United States v. Joseph B. DavisCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1977
  2. United States v. SischoSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
  3. In Re Bielenberg's EstateMontana Supreme Court · 1930
  4. Hanson v. WilliamsMontana Supreme Court · 1965
  5. In Re Bodin's EstateMontana Supreme Court · 1965

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API