Legal Opinion

Taylor v. Black Diamond Coal Mining Co.

California Supreme Court

Decided December 4, 1890No. 12965PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of the city and county of San Francisco, and from an order denying a new trial. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtMcFarland, J.

This action was brought by plaintiff, as assignee of Hoyt & McKee, attorneys at law, to recover from defendant a balance due for professional services. Judgment went for plaintiff in the court below, *590from which, and from an order denying a new trial, defendant appeals.

Hoyt & McKee made a contract with defendant, by which they were to receive a certain compensation for their services as attorneys, provided they should accomplish certain results. Afterwards, McKee, as surviving member of the firm of Hoyt & McKee (Hoyt having died before the services were quite all rendered), assigned to the…

2Cited by9 opinions

  1. Goodley v. Wank & Wank, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1976
  2. Trubowitch v. Riverbank Canning Co.California Supreme Court · 1947
  3. Florance v. KresgeCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1938
  4. Sumner v. NevinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1906
  5. Murphy v. Luthy Battery Co.California Court of Appeal · 1925

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API