Legal Opinion
South Central Bell Telephone Co. v. State
Supreme Court of Alabama
Decided November 17, 1999No. 1960591PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
(Interim Order)
This is a franchise-tax case.
The Century Dictionary (1891), Vol. VI, p. 6201, defines the word "tax" in its first definition as follows:
"(1) A disagreeable or burdensome duty or charge; an exaction; a requisition; an oppressive demand; strain; burden; task."
The same dictionary, Vol. II, p. 2360, defines "franchise" as:
"A privilege arising from the grant of a sovereign or government or from prescription, which presupposes a grant; a privilege of a public nature conferred on individuals by grant from government: as, a corporate franchise (the right to be and act as a…
2Cases cited36 opinions
- Towne v. EisnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1918
- Richards v. Jefferson CountySupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Western Union Telegraph Co. v. Kansas Ex Rel. ColemanSupreme Court of the United States · 1910
- Southern Railway Co. v. GreeneSupreme Court of the United States · 1910
- South Central Bell Telephone Co. v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Patterson v. Gladwin Corp.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2002
- Chism v. Jefferson CountySupreme Court of Alabama · 2006
- South Cent. Bell Telephone Co. v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 2000
- Ex Parte Ted's Game EnterprisesSupreme Court of Alabama · 2004
- Ex Parte Ted's Game EnterprisesSupreme Court of Alabama · 2004
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.