Legal Opinion

South Central Bell Telephone Co. v. State

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided November 17, 1999No. 1960591PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

(Interim Order)

This is a franchise-tax case.

The Century Dictionary (1891), Vol. VI, p. 6201, defines the word "tax" in its first definition as follows:

"(1) A disagreeable or burdensome duty or charge; an exaction; a requisition; an oppressive demand; strain; burden; task."

The same dictionary, Vol. II, p. 2360, defines "franchise" as:

"A privilege arising from the grant of a sovereign or government or from prescription, which presupposes a grant; a privilege of a public nature conferred on individuals by grant from government: as, a corporate franchise (the right to be and act as a…

2Cases cited36 opinions

  1. Towne v. EisnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1918
  2. Richards v. Jefferson CountySupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  3. Western Union Telegraph Co. v. Kansas Ex Rel. ColemanSupreme Court of the United States · 1910
  4. Southern Railway Co. v. GreeneSupreme Court of the United States · 1910
  5. South Central Bell Telephone Co. v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1999

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Patterson v. Gladwin Corp.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2002
  2. Chism v. Jefferson CountySupreme Court of Alabama · 2006
  3. South Cent. Bell Telephone Co. v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 2000
  4. Ex Parte Ted's Game EnterprisesSupreme Court of Alabama · 2004
  5. Ex Parte Ted's Game EnterprisesSupreme Court of Alabama · 2004

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API