Legal Opinion

Mansourian v. Regents of the University of California

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided February 8, 2010No. 08-16330PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

The opinion filed on February 8, 2010, is hereby amended. The amended opinion is attached hereto. With this amendment, Judges Schroeder and Berzon have voted to deny the petition for rehearing and to reject the suggestion for rehearing en banc, and Judge Shadur so recommends.

The full court has been advised of the suggestion for rehearing en banc and no active judge has requested a vote on whether to rehear the matter en banc. Fed. R.App. P. 35.

The petition for rehearing is DENIED and the suggestion for rehearing en banc is REJECTED. No future petitions for rehearing will be entertained.

OP…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. National Railroad Passenger Corporation v. MorganSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
  3. Dairl Johnson Claudine Johnson v. Mammoth Recreations, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
  4. Cannon v. University of ChicagoSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  5. Davis Ex Rel. LaShonda D. v. Monroe County Board of EducationSupreme Court of the United States · 1999

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Ollier v. Sweetwater Union High School DistrictDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2012
  2. Schuler v. PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS, LLPDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2010
  3. Amber Moreno v. BenasDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2022
  4. Schuler v. Pricewaterhousecoopers,llpDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2010
  5. White v. United Parcel Service, Inc.District Court, E.D. California · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API