Juliano v. State
Court of Special Appeals of Maryland
1Opinion of the CourtBarbera, J.
This appeal requires us to consider the constitutionality of Maryland’s restitution statute, formerly codified at Maryland Code (1957, 1996 Repl.Vol., 2000 Supp.), Article 27, § 807. 1 Appellant, Michael Juliano, contends that the statute eliminates the requirement that the State prove the victim’s entitlement to restitution. For the reasons we shall discuss, that contention fails.
Appellant also complains about the amount of restitution he has been ordered to pay, and the prosecutor’s comments and conduct during his rebuttal to the defense’s closing argument. We discern no abuse of discretion…
2Cases cited45 opinions
- Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- McMillan v. PennsylvaniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- United States v. WattsSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- State v. HughesWashington Supreme Court · 2005
- State v. HughesWashington Supreme Court · 2005
40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Addison v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2010
- McDaniel v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2012