Legal Opinion

Mulholland v. Jones

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided June 19, 1912PublishedCited by 2 opinions

On error to the Supreme Court.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Kalisch, J.

The defendant, Jones, entered into a contract, in writing, with one Archibald for the building of a house. The contract was filed in the office of the clerk of the county where the building was to be erected. The effect of such filing was to prevent anybody from obtaining a lien upon the building andl curtilage, except Archibald. Archibald subcontracted the plumbing work to Mulholland, the plaintiff, for which work Mulholland was to receive $390; $150 when the'rough plumbing was done and the balance when the fixtures were installed.…

2Cited by2 opinions

  1. The CITY NAT. BANK & TRUST CO. OF SALEM v. HasslerNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1950
  2. Federal Wine & Liquor Co. v. Jabberwock Country ClubSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1938

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API