Mulholland v. Jones
Supreme Court of New Jersey
On error to the Supreme Court.
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Kalisch, J.
The defendant, Jones, entered into a contract, in writing, with one Archibald for the building of a house. The contract was filed in the office of the clerk of the county where the building was to be erected. The effect of such filing was to prevent anybody from obtaining a lien upon the building andl curtilage, except Archibald. Archibald subcontracted the plumbing work to Mulholland, the plaintiff, for which work Mulholland was to receive $390; $150 when the'rough plumbing was done and the balance when the fixtures were installed.…
2Cited by2 opinions
- The CITY NAT. BANK & TRUST CO. OF SALEM v. HasslerNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1950
- Federal Wine & Liquor Co. v. Jabberwock Country ClubSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1938