Legal Opinion

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, — v. CHRISTINA M. HAIDLEY, —

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided March 16, 2005No. 04-3312PublishedCited by 76 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MELLOY, Circuit Judge.

In a pre-Blakely era,1 this would have been a routine federal sentencing guideline case. The government charged Haidley in a one-count information with bank embezzlement. The information specifically alleged that the loss amount was $135,000. Haidley waived indictment and pled guilty to the information. At the plea proceeding, she specifically stipulated to the $135,000 loss.

The probation office prepared a presen-tence report. The report determined Ms. Haidley’s guideline sentencing offense level to be a level thirteen, criminal history category I. The offense level was…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. United States v. BookerSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  3. United States v. OlanoSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  4. Kotteakos v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
  5. O'NEAL v. McAninchSupreme Court of the United States · 1995

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by76 opinions

  1. United States v. Jesus Adrian Beng-SalazarCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006
  2. United States v. Dennis MarcussenCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2005
  3. United States v. Unis BahCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2006
  4. United States v. Vazquez-RiveraCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2005
  5. United States v. AndrewsCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2006

71 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API