UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, — v. CHRISTINA M. HAIDLEY, —
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
MELLOY, Circuit Judge.
In a pre-Blakely era,1 this would have been a routine federal sentencing guideline case. The government charged Haidley in a one-count information with bank embezzlement. The information specifically alleged that the loss amount was $135,000. Haidley waived indictment and pled guilty to the information. At the plea proceeding, she specifically stipulated to the $135,000 loss.
The probation office prepared a presen-tence report. The report determined Ms. Haidley’s guideline sentencing offense level to be a level thirteen, criminal history category I. The offense level was…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- United States v. BookerSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- United States v. OlanoSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Kotteakos v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- O'NEAL v. McAninchSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by76 opinions
- United States v. Jesus Adrian Beng-SalazarCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006
- United States v. Dennis MarcussenCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2005
- United States v. Unis BahCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2006
- United States v. Vazquez-RiveraCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2005
- United States v. AndrewsCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2006
71 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.