Legal Opinion

Assad v. Gelb

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided April 15, 1985PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*739Plaintiffs sought relief from Special Term from an unconditional order of preclusion granted on default, based upon their failure to respond to defendants’ demands for bills of particulars. Special Term properly denied the motion to vacate for lack of an affidavit of merit from an expert competent to testify to evidentiary facts which would support plaintiffs’ claim of professional malpractice (Horvath v Bayonne Hosp., 99 AD2d 824; Nelson v Eastman Dental Center, 85 AD2d 887). Furthermore, plaintiffs’ attorney did not set forth any reasonable excuse for the failure to comply with defendants’…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. FID. & DEPOSIT CO. OF MARYLAND v. Arthur Andersen & Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1983
  2. De Vito v. Marine Midland Bank, N. A.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984
  3. Nelson v. Eastman Dental CenterAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1981
  4. Horvath v. Bayonne HospitalAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Onorio v. MillerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988
  2. Michaels v. WetsellAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API