Legal Opinion
Lee v. Goldman
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided November 9, 1998PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
—In an action to recover damages for dental malpractice, the defendant appeals from so much of an amended order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Levine, *367J.), dated November 7, 1997, as denied that branch of his motion which was for partial summary judgment dismissing portions of the verified complaint as time-barred.
Ordered that the amended order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.
Contrary to the defendant’s contentions, the plaintiffs’ submissions in opposition to the application for partial summary judgment, including the defendant’s own treatment chart and deposition…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- McDermott v. TorreNew York Court of Appeals · 1982
- Kimiatek v. PostAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
- Parker v. JankunasAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
- Ciciless v. LaneAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987
- Easton v. KellermanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
3Cited by4 opinions
- Rinker v. OberoiAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
- Cohen v. GoldAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2018
- Pietromonaco v. SchwartzmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
- Silver v. ApfelAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001