Legal Opinion

Galenski v. Ford Motor Co. Pension Plan

District Court, E.D. Michigan

Decided March 17, 2006No. 05-CV-71441-DTPublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND ORDER

ZATKOFF, District Judge.

I. INTRODUCTION

This matter is before the Court on Plaintiffs “Motion for Summary Judgment” (Docket # 6). 1 Defendant jointly filed a response to Plaintiffs Motion for Summary Judgment and a Counter-Motion for Affirmation of ERISA Administra 1 tive Decision (Docket # 8). Plaintiff has filed a reply to Defendant’s response and Counter-Motion and Defendant has filed a sur-reply. The Court finds that the facts and legal arguments pertinent to Plaintiffs Motion and Defendant’s Counter-Motion are adequately presented in the parties’ papers, and the…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. BruchSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  2. Bob G. Wilkins v. Baptist Healthcare System, Inc. Life Insurance Company of North AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1998
  3. Boggs v. BoggsSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  4. Connie M. Miller v. Metropolitan Life Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1991
  5. Arthur Fallick v. Nationwide Mutual Insurance Company Nationwide Life Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1998

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Galenski v. Ford Motor Co. Pension PlanCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2008

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API