Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

United States v. Howard

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided January 14, 1957No. 52PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Reed

A federal criminal information was filed by the United States against Ludenia Howard, trading as Stokes Fish Company, appellee, in the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida, charging her with a violation of the Federal Black Bass Act of May 20, 1926, as amended, c. 346, 44 Stat. 576, 46 Stat. 845, 61 Stat. 517, 66 Stat. 736, 16 U. S. C. §§851-854. The Act provides:

“It shall be unlawful for any person to deliver . . . for transportation . . . from any State . . . any black bass or other fish, if (1) such transportation is contrary to the law of the State . . . from…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. United States v. GrimaudSupreme Court of the United States · 1911
  2. Prentis v. Atlantic Coast Line Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1908
  3. Caha v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
  4. United States v. EatonSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
  5. Singer v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1945

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 95,560 United States of America v. David B. CharnayCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1976
  2. United States v. Jack Ivey and William "Rusty" Wallace, IIICourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1991
  3. United States v. 594,464 Pounds of Salmon, More or Less, Appeal of Union, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989
  4. United States v. Yuri IzurietaCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2013
  5. In re: FBOP Execution Protocol CasesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2020

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API