Legal Opinion

Wishek v. Hammond

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided December 5, 1900PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Appeal from District Court, McIntosh County; Lauder, J. Action by John H. Wishek against Cassius C. Hammond. From the judgment, both parties appeal.

1Opinion of the CourtBartholomew, C. J.

The motion to dismiss the defendant’s appeal must be denied. It is based upon the proposition that appellant has accepted a benefit under the judgment, and thereby waived his right of appeal, or estopped himself from exercising such right. The action was in equity for the dissolution of a partnership and an accounting. The plaintiff and defendant had been partners in the real estate business for some years. It appears that, when the action was brought, appellant was in possession of the assets of the firm, consisting of notes and accounts and an amount of money. The decree dissolved the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Tyler v. SheaNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1894
  2. Hixon v. Oneida CountyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1892
  3. Sloane v. AndersonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1883
  4. Goodlett v. St. Elmo Investment Co.California Supreme Court · 1892
  5. Mcintyre v. German Savings BankNew York Supreme Court · 1891

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Martinson v. First National Bank of Oakes (In Re Martinson)District Court, D. North Dakota · 1983
  2. Moore v. MooreIndiana Court of Appeals · 1922
  3. Easton v. LockhartNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1902
  4. Peck v. RichterCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1914
  5. Willbur v. JohnsonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1915

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API