Legal Opinion

Pennsylvania State Horse Racing Commission v. DiSanto

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 21, 1977No. Appeal, No. 93 C.D. 1976PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Judge Kramer,

This is an appeal by Alex A. DiSanto (DiSanto) from an Order of the Pennsylvania State Horse Racing Commission (Commission) dated December 17,• 1975. The Order suspends DiSanto’s license to race horses in Pennsylvania for a period of five years for violating Rule 1.11 of the Pennsylvania Rules of Racing.1

The conduct of Mr. DiSanto deemed to be in violation of Rule 1.11 occurred on September 7, 1975. On that day he telephoned the Penn National Race Track and requested that his horse, Brass Knight, be scratched from the field of horses scheduled to run in the first race.…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Williams v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
  2. State Dental Council & Examining Board v. PollockSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
  3. Lanchester v. Pennsylvania State Horse Racing CommissionCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
  4. Benford v. Real Estate CommissionCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
  5. Johnson v. State Horse Racing CommissionCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1972

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Daly v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
  2. Peterson v. Commonwealth, State Horse Racing CommissionCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
  3. Lemberos v. Laurel Racecourse, Inc.District Court, D. Maryland · 1980
  4. Frizalone v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
  5. Striker v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1978

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API