Legal Opinion
Limoneira Co. v. Wirtz
District Court, S.D. California
Decided May 29, 1963No. Civ. No. 2820-SD-KPublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
KUNZEL, District Judge.
The questions to be decided on defendants’ motion for summary judgment are:
1. Whether there is any basis for plaintiffs’ claim that the Secretary of Labor exceeded his statutory authority in fixing a minimum wage rate to be paid Mexican agricultural workers, hereinafter referred to as “braceros”, by orders of March 29, 1962 and October 19, 1962, and
2. Whether there is any substance to plaintiffs’ claim that Section 503 of the Agricultural Workers Importation Act as amended, 7 U.S.C.A. § 1463, is unconstitutional, necessitating the convening of a three-judge court…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Yakus v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
- A. L. A. Schechter Poultry Corp. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
- Panama Refining Co. v. RyanSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
- United States v. Rock Royal Co-Operative, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1939
- Wicks v. Brotherhood of Maintenance of Way EmployeesSupreme Court of the United States · 1956
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- AFL-CIO v. BrockDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1987
- Production Farm Management v. William Brock, Secretary of LaborCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985
- Limoneira Co. v. WirtzCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1964
- Limoneira Company, a California Corporation, Roger Donlon, Paul B. Kersten and E. B. Antonell v. W. Willard Wirtz and Robert C. GoodwinCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1964