Legal Opinion

Stensvad v. Industrial Commission

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided October 21, 1968No. 23282PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Groves.

This is an unemployment compensation case. A deputy of the Department of Employment ruled that the plaintiff in error, herein called claimant, was not entitled to benefits. After hearing, a referee of the Industrial Commission of Colorado (ex-officio Unemployment Compen sation Commission of Colorado) likewise held that she was not entitled to benefits. This decision in turn was affirmed by the Commission and the district court. We affirm.

Claimant had been a hairdresser for approximately three years prior to December of 1966. For one year during this period she…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Morrison Road Bar, Inc. v. Industrial CommissionSupreme Court of Colorado · 1958
  2. Industrial Commission v. WilbanksSupreme Court of Colorado · 1954

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Ball v. Industrial CommissionColorado Court of Appeals · 1972
  2. Dueweke v. Morang Drive Greenhouses, Inc.Michigan Supreme Court · 1981
  3. Pierce v. Industrial CommissionColorado Court of Appeals · 1976

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API