Legal Opinion
Key Bank v. Dembs
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided November 19, 1997PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
—Order unanimously affirmed without costs. Memorandum: Because the subpoenas at issue are not part of the record, we cannot review the contentions of Renald E. Dembs (defendant) that Supreme Court erred in quashing the subpoena served upon David Peatfield and in failing to compel Steven Pierce to produce corporate records pursuant to a subpoena served upon him (see, Solomon v Solomon, 206 AD2d 971, 972; see also, People v Peak, 214 AD2d 1012, 1013, lv denied 86 NY2d 800). Moreover, the record establishes that defendant impermissibly issued the subpoena to Pierce during trial for the purpose…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- In re Terry D.New York Court of Appeals · 1993
- Cushman & Wakefield Inc. v. 214 East 49th Street Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
- Cushman & Wakefield, Inc. v. 214 East 49th Street Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1996
- State v. MastracciAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1980
- Solomon v. SolomonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- On the Water Prods., LLC v. GlynosAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2022
- Lewis v. Carrols LLCAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2018