Legal Opinion
Estate of Claude Brooks, by and Through Its Administrator, Clarence "Ed" Brooks v. United States of America, and County of Alameda
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided November 18, 1999No. 98-15063PublishedCited by 106 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by Judge GRABER; Dissent by Judge MICHAEL DALY HAWKINS.
GRABER, Circuit Judge:
At the request of the United States Marshals Service (Marshals Service), the County of Alameda (County) held Claude Brooks, a federal detainee, in pretrial detention for 12 days. During that time, Brooks was not arraigned or brought before a federal judicial officer. After his release pursuant to federal instructions, Brooks filed this action against the County, the individual Deputy United States Marshals, and the United States, alleging *1247(as now pertinent) violation of his eonstitm-tional rights, 42 U.S.C. §…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Asgari v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1997
- United States v. Bryan K. KalunaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999
- Allen W. HICKS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Dr. Elisabeth SMALL, M.D., Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
- City of Newport Beach v. SasseCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by106 opinions
- Moya v. GarciaCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2018
- Nichols v. LoganDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2004
- Hayes v. WoodfordDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2006
- Rudy Rivera v. CcaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2021
- Kuchcinski v. Box Elder CountyUtah Supreme Court · 2019
101 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.