Legal Opinion

States v. Law

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided May 12, 1924No. 4158PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HUNT, Circuit Judge.

This is an action against the United States to recover for alleged permanent total disability incurred by Law while serving in the United States Army; the disabilities consisting of loss of left arm, injury to left leg from shell wound, weakening of the arches of the feet, and nervous infirmity. The government denied permanent' and total disability, within the intent and meaning of the War Risk Insurance Act and pleaded that Law’s contract of insurance lapsed' March 31, 1919, by reason of nonpayment of premiums. By replication Law pleaded that premiums were not due…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Cassarello v. United StatesDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1919
  2. Helmholz v. HorstCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1924

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. United States v. SlighCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1929
  2. United States v. CoxCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1928
  3. McClure v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1938
  4. United States v. ThomasCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1931
  5. Oyler v. Cleveland, C. C. & ST. L. RY. CO.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1926

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API