Legal Opinion

Nantucket Conservation Foundation, Inc. v. Russell Management, Inc.

Massachusetts Appeals Court

Decided September 17, 1974PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The defendant appeals from so much of a final decree of the Land Court as declared that the defendant’s easement in a certain private way across land of the plaintiff gave the defendant no right to install utilities therein for the benefit of the land to which its easement was appurtenant. Those utilities were identified in the parties’ statement of agreed facts as “including but not limited to such conduits, pipes, wires, poles, cables or other instrumentalities needed in connection with the provision of electricity, water, gas, telephone, or other municipal or utility services” to the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Flynn v. BrassardMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1974
  2. Ward v. McGloryMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1970
  3. Crullen v. Edison Electric Illuminating Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1925
  4. Ampagoomian v. AtamianMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1948

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Town of Brookline v. GoldsteinMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1983
  2. Nantucket Conservation Foundation, Inc. v. Russell Management, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1980
  3. Doe v. Registrar of Motor VehiclesMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1988
  4. Commonwealth v. TracyMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1989
  5. Adams v. Planning BoardMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2005

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API