Legal Opinion

Crofton v. Bargreen

Washington Supreme Court

Decided December 10, 1958No. 34409PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDonworth, J.

This action was brought by William Crofton and his son to recover the balance allegedly due under an option contained in a written partnership agreement *244which had been exercised by appellant. The trial court entered judgment for respondents in accordance with the prayer of the complaint, and appellant has appealed therefrom.

For convenience, William Crofton will be referred to as though he were the sole respondent, since his son, George, was a party plaintiff as the heir of his mother who had a community interest in the option at the time of her death. The son did not participate in any of the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Boeing Airplane Co. v. Firemen's Fund Indemnity Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1954
  2. Ryan v. RyanWashington Supreme Court · 1956
  3. Carnation Lumber & Shingle Co. v. Tolt Land Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1918
  4. Kelly v. Valley Construction Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1953
  5. Hering v. St. Paul-Mercury Indemnity Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1957

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Patterson v. BixbyWashington Supreme Court · 1961
  2. Kennedy v. Weyerhaeuser Timber Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1959
  3. Crofton v. BargreenWashington Supreme Court · 1958
  4. Kennedy v. Weyerhaeuser Timber Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1959
  5. King v. MolthanWashington Supreme Court · 1959

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API