Legal Opinion
City of Akron v. Wendell
Ohio Court of Appeals
Decided October 24, 1990No. 14541PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Cacioppo, Judge.
Defendant-appellants, Kathleen M. Drumm, Mary O. Drumm, Charles F. Hoskins, Sylvia C. Slifko, and Stephen Michael Slifko, appeal their conviction for resisting arrest, R.C. 2921.33, trespassing, Akron Codified Ordinance (“ACO”) Section 131.08(B)(1), and disorderly conduct, ACO Section 132.-01(A)(4), arising from their protests at a medical clinic offering abortion services. We affirm.
In the morning hours of January 13, 1990, appellants participated in a demonstration at an Akron area abortion clinic. The protesters surrounded the entrances to the clinic and refused to allow…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Witherspoon v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- State v. JenkinsOhio Supreme Court · 1984
- State v. LoganOhio Supreme Court · 1979
- State v. WilliamsOhio Supreme Court · 1977
- State v. BaylessOhio Supreme Court · 1976
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Kremer v. CoxOhio Court of Appeals · 1996
- Eastwood Mall, Inc. v. SlancoOhio Supreme Court · 1994
- State v. BilderOhio Court of Appeals · 1994
- City of Cincinnati v. ThompsonOhio Court of Appeals · 1994
- Austin v. SquireOhio Court of Appeals · 1997
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.