Legal Opinion · Dissent

Otjen v. Kerr

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided December 18, 1942No. 31227Published

1DissentArnold, J.

Our election contest laws contemplate a practical and adequate plan of procedure to test the verity of the returns of any county, district, or state election. As to county offices the provisions are plain, simple, and direct. As to district and state offices the plan appears somewhat more complicated, but when considered carefully, keeping in mind the evident intention of the Legislature to provide a contest and recount therein when a proper case is presented, the conclusion is inescapable that the people, speaking through legislative enactment, intended to provide for a recount in district…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Looney v. County Election Board of Seminole CountySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1930
  2. Logan v. YoungSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1926
  3. Brown v. BransonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1928
  4. Looney v. County Election Board of Hughes CountySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1930
  5. Albright v. Election Board of Payne CountySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API