Legal Opinion

Causey v. Matson

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided September 11, 1959No. 20545PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Head, Justice.

The defendant made no question by demurrer as to the sufficiency of the allegations of the petition to show that the purchase price was adequate, and the option to purchase fair, just, and equitable. See Ogletree v. Ingram & LeGrand Lumber Co., 207 Ga. 333 (2) (61 S. E. 2d 480); Wehunt v. Pritchett, 208 Ga. 441, 444 (67 S. E. 2d 233); Almand v. Williams, 208 Ga. 703 (69 S. E. 2d 271); Alexander v. American Legion Post No. 28 of Chamblee, 209 Ga. 285 (2) (71 S. E. 2d 627); Sikes v. Sims, 212 Ga. 391 (7) (93 S. E. 2d 6).

The answer of the defendant .alleges that he was “induced to…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Wehunt v. PritchettSupreme Court of Georgia · 1951
  2. Bond v. KiddSupreme Court of Georgia · 1905
  3. Mallory v. Royston BankSupreme Court of Georgia · 1911
  4. Whitt v. BlountSupreme Court of Georgia · 1906
  5. King v. LewisSupreme Court of Georgia · 1939

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Charter Medical Management Co. v. Ware Manor, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1981
  2. Alfred R. Chouinard, II and Ginger Leigh Chouinard v. Alfred F. ChouinardCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1978
  3. General Motors Acceptance Corp. v. Bowen Motors, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1983
  4. Cannon v. KitchensSupreme Court of Georgia · 1977
  5. Hazen v. Rich's, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1976

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API