Legal Opinion
The Hidden Splendor Mining Company v. General Insurance Company of America
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided December 23, 1966No. 8223_1PublishedCited by 24 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MURRAH, Chief Judge.
In this diversity suit Hidden Splendor Mining Co. (successor of Rio de Oro Uranium Mines, Inc.) seeks to recover from its bonding company for fraudulent appropriations of corporate assets by a corporation employee. The trial court, sitting without a jury, held that the prerequisite notice provisions of the bond had not been complied with, and accordingly entered judgment for the bonding company. We think the trial court was plainly right.
The bonding company-appellee, General Insurance Co. of America, agreed to indemnify “against any loss * * * which the Insured shall…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- American Surety Company v. PaulySupreme Court of the United States · 1898
- W. Rodney Devilliers and Orco Corporation v. Atlas CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1966
- Zengerle v. the Commonwealth Insurance Co. of NYNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1958
- Brown v. Maryland Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1940
- Gilmour v. Standard Surety & Casualty Co. of New YorkMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1935
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- Hanley v. Chrysler Motors Corp.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1970
- First Security Savings v. Kansas Bankers Surety Co. v. James L. Gillette, Third Party First Security Bank & Trust v. Kansas Bankers Surety Co.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1988
- Perkins v. Clinton State BankCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1979
- Pacific-Southern Mortgage Trust Co. v. Insurance Co.California Court of Appeal · 1985
- Joseph Schenfeld v. Norton CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1968
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.