Legal Opinion

Charley v. Goss

New York Court of Appeals

Decided February 24, 2009PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed with costs.

Defendants Howard Conroy and Margaret Goss presented prima facie evidence, including plaintiffs deposition testimony and medical records, that plaintiff did not suffer a serious injury within the meaning of Insurance Law § 5102 (d) (see Toure v Avis Rent A Car Sys., 98 NY2d 345 [2002]). In opposition, plaintiff failed to raise a triable issue of fact.

Chief Judge Lippman and Judges Ciparick, Graffeo, Read, Smith, Pigott and Jones concur.

On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.11 of the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Toure v. Avis Rent a Car Systems, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 2002

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Clemmer v. Drah Cab Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
  2. Heller v. JansmaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
  3. Antonio v. Gear Trans Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
  4. Graves v. L&N Car ServiceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
  5. Conder v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API