In re Kollman
Court of Customs and Patent Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
BALDWIN, Judge.
This appeal is from the decision of the Patent and Trademark Office (PTO) Board of Appeals (board) affirming the rejection of claims 1 and 3-15 1 in appellants’ application serial No. 547,292, filed February 5, 1975, for “Synergistic Herbicidal Composition.”
The board affirmed the examiner’s rejection of all claims under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as unpatentable “over the teachings of Bayer et al., Poignant et al., Inoue et al., and Tischler.” The board also entered new rejections, pursuant to its authority under 37 C.F.R. 1.196(b),2 of the claims under 35 U.S.C. §§ 103 or 102 over Bayer…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Application of Alan B. HuellmantelCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1963
- In re SchaumannCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1978
- In re GreenfieldCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1978
- Application of George W. Luvisi and Thomas C. NohejlCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1965
- Application of Alan J. Lemin, Arnolds Steinhards and George SwankCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1969
3Cited by4 opinions
- Ultradent Products, Inc. v. Life-Like Cosmetics, Inc. D/B/A Life-Like Dental Products and Rodney F. OgrinCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1997
- In re ClemensCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1980
- E.I. Du Pont de Nemours & Co. v. Phillips Petroleum Co.District Court, D. Delaware · 1987
- EI Du Pont De Nemours v. Phillips Pet. Co.District Court, D. Delaware · 1987