Legal Opinion

Beevers v. M.H.

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided November 24, 1992No. 17837PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MAUS, Judge.

This appeal stems from the termination of the parental rights of M.H., T.H. and E.B. to two children, R.I.H. and K.D.H. M.H. is the mother of R.I.H. and K.D.H. Both children were born during her marriage to T.H. However, M.H. asserted E.B. was the putative father of K.D.H. Only M.H. appeals from the judgment of termination.

The children were taken into protective custody by the Howell County Juvenile Officer on December 6, 1989, and December 12, 1989. That custody was, pursuant to Rule 111.02 b. (3), continued by ex parte orders on December 7,1989, and December 13, 1989. On March…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. In the Interest of D.G.N. v. S.M.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1985
  2. Stiffelman v. AbramsSupreme Court of Missouri · 1983
  3. Staley v. Missouri Director of RevenueSupreme Court of Missouri · 1981
  4. State v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Missouri · 1971
  5. In Interest of Baby Girl W.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1987

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Kierst v. A.O.G.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1998
  2. In Re AHMissouri Court of Appeals · 2005
  3. Y.O. v. Barton County Juvenile OfficeMissouri Court of Appeals · 2005

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API