Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. Ahrens v. City of Cleveland

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided April 6, 1938No. 26787PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWiltjams, J.

The sole question presented is whether the appellant Helen Ahrens was entitled to have the proceeding in mandamus revived in her name, as administratrix and individually, upon the death of relator.

At common law an action at law abated on the death of the sole plaintiff and if the cause of action did survive the only way that the right of action could be asserted was by the commencement of a new action.

This rule has been changed by statute in this state. Section 11397, General Code, provides: “Unless otherwise provided, no action or proceeding pending in any court shall abate by the death of…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. People Ex Rel. Sherwood v. State Board of CanvassersNew York Court of Appeals · 1891
  2. State ex rel. Matheny v. County Court of Wyoming CountyWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1900
  3. Booze v. HumbirdCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1867
  4. County Commissioners v. BrysonSupreme Court of Florida · 1869
  5. Hardee v. GibbsMississippi Supreme Court · 1874

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Samson v. NeumannNebraska Supreme Court · 1942
  2. State Ex Rel. Tobin v. SweeneyOhio Supreme Court · 1942
  3. Walter v. Board of EducationAppellate Court of Illinois · 1981
  4. Squire v. Guardian Trust Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1946
  5. State v. DennisOhio Court of Appeals · 2022

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API