Sloan v. Metropolitan Health Council of Indianapolis, Inc.
Indiana Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
NEAL, Judge.
STATEMENT OF THE CASE
Plaintiffs-appellants, Craig Sloan and Karen Sloan (the Sloans), suffered an adverse summary judgment rendered by the Hancock Superior Court in favor of the Metropolitan Health Council of Indianapolis, Inc., d/b/a Metro-Health Plan (Metro), in their suit for malpractice.
We reverse.
STATEMENT OF THE FACTS
The evidentiary material before the trial court in its consideration of Metro's motion for summary judgment was as follows. Metro is a not-for-profit corporation organized to provide a prepaid health care delivery plan, or, as it terms itself, a health…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Zimmerman v. Hogg & Allen, Professional Ass'nSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1974
- Moll v. South Central Solar Systems, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1981
- Iterman v. BakerIndiana Supreme Court · 1938
- Ross v. SchubertIndiana Court of Appeals · 1979
- Estate of Mathes v. IrelandIndiana Court of Appeals · 1981
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Petrovich v. Share Health Plan of Illinois, Inc.Illinois Supreme Court · 1999
- Sword v. NKC Hospitals, Inc.Indiana Supreme Court · 1999
- Chase v. INDEPENDENT PRACTICE ASSOCIATION, INCMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1991
- Dunn v. PraissNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1992
- Castillo v. RuggieroIndiana Court of Appeals · 1990
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.