Legal Opinion
Buckner v. Internal Revenue Service
District Court, N.D. Indiana
Decided July 24, 1998No. 1:97-cv-00414PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OF DECISION AND ORDER
WILLIAM C. LEE, Chief Judge.
Defendant Internal Revenue Service (“IRS”), filed a Motion for Summary Judgment on March 31, 1998. Plaintiff, David E. Buckner (“Buckner”), proceeding pro se, responded on May 7,1998. The IRS has elected not to reply. For the following reasons, the Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment will be GRANTED.
1. Factual and Procedural Background
Buckner, pro se, commenced the current action on November 12, 1997, under the Freedom of Information Act (“FOIA”), 5 U.S.C. § 552, as amended, seeking declaratory and injunctive relief. The IRS…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- National Labor Relations Board v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Robert G. Vaughn v. Bernard Rosen, Executive Director, United States Civil Service CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1973
- Mead Data Central, Inc. v. United States Department of the Air ForceCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1977
- United States Department of Defense v. Federal Labor Relations AuthoritySupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Cynthia King v. United States Department of JusticeCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1987
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Evergreen Trading, LLC ex rel. GN Investments, LLC v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2007
- Tax Analysts v. Internal Revenue ServiceDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2001
- Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co. v. Chiles Power Supply, Inc.District Court, S.D. Indiana · 1999
- Goldstein v. Internal Revenue ServiceDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2016
- (PS) Francis v. Los Rios Community College DistrictDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2020
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.