Legal Opinion

Farrar v. Kelly

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided October 24, 1983No. 15,748-CAPublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

440 So.2d 939 (1983)

Bennie Mac FARRAR and F. Murray Biedenharn

v.

Junius R. KELLY, Jr.

No. 15,748-CA.

Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Second Circuit.

October 24, 1983.

Harvey R. Lexing, Monroe, for appellant.

Farrar, Jefferson & Wooley by Bennie Mac Farrar and F. Murray Biedenharm, pro se, Monroe, for appellees.

Before PRICE, HALL and SEXTON, JJ.

HALL, Judge.

This is a suit by attorneys for specific performance of a contingent fee contract with a former client. From the trial court judgment ordering specific performance the defendant has appealed.

On appeal the defendant contends that the contract is…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Saucier v. Hayes Dairy Products, Inc.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1979
  2. Succession of BrownSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1980
  3. Simon v. MetoyerLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1980
  4. Garden Hill Land Corp. v. CambreLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1978
  5. Succession of BrownLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1980

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Goldstein & Price, L.C. v. Tonkin & Mondl, L.C.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1998
  2. In Re WallerDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1987
  3. Reed v. VerwoerdtLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1986
  4. Watson v. CookLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1993
  5. In Re WallerDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1987

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API