Legal Opinion
Haney v. Timesavers, Inc.
District Court, D. Oregon
Decided November 15, 1993No. Civ. 93-151-FRPublished
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
FRYE, District Judge:
The matter before the court is the motion of plaintiff for summary judgment on counterclaim II of defendants (#61).
BACKGROUND
Plaintiff, Donald E. Haney, brings this action against defendants, Timesavers, Inc., Jeff Terrill Machinery, Inc., and Akhurst Machinery, Inc. (hereafter, Timesavers), alleging willful infringement of U.S. Patent Nos. 5,081,794 and 5,181,342.
Timesavers has brought a counterclaim against Haney alleging a violation of Minn. Stat. 825D.43 et seq. based upon allegations of unfair or deceptive trade practices.
CONTENTIONS OF THE PARTIES
Haney…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Unique Concepts, Inc. v. ManuelDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1987
- Waco-Porter Corporation v. Tubular Structures Corp.District Court, S.D. California · 1963