Manders v. Pulice
Appellate Court of Illinois
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Seidenfeld
Plaintiffs appeal from judgments entered on jury verdicts in a suit claiming injury to Phyllis Manders and damages to Frank Manders for loss of his wife’s consortium arising out of the same collision. Judgment in the amount of $6,000 was entered on the guilty verdict against the defendant Peter Pulice for the wife; judgment of “0” damages was entered on the guilty verdict against the defendant, for the husband. Plaintiffs’ motion for a new trial on damages alone, or in the alternative, for a new trial, was denied.
Plaintiffs, in support of their appeal for the same alternative relief here,…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Dini v. NaiditchIllinois Supreme Court · 1960
- Gray v. . Brooklyn Heights R.R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1903
- Haleem v. OnateAppellate Court of Illinois · 1966
- Chapin v. FoegeAppellate Court of Illinois · 1938
- Kimmel v. HefnerAppellate Court of Illinois · 1962
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Sostock v. ReissAppellate Court of Illinois · 1980
- Manders v. PuliceIllinois Supreme Court · 1970
- Pease v. ACE HARDWARE HOME CENTER OF ROUND LAKE NO. 252cAppellate Court of Illinois · 1986
- Coulter v. RenshawAppellate Court of Illinois · 1981
- Tice v. EbelingSupreme Court of Kansas · 1986
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.