Legal Opinion

Manders v. Pulice

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided November 27, 1968No. Gen. 68-15PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Seidenfeld

Plaintiffs appeal from judgments entered on jury verdicts in a suit claiming injury to Phyllis Manders and damages to Frank Manders for loss of his wife’s consortium arising out of the same collision. Judgment in the amount of $6,000 was entered on the guilty verdict against the defendant Peter Pulice for the wife; judgment of “0” damages was entered on the guilty verdict against the defendant, for the husband. Plaintiffs’ motion for a new trial on damages alone, or in the alternative, for a new trial, was denied.

Plaintiffs, in support of their appeal for the same alternative relief here,…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Dini v. NaiditchIllinois Supreme Court · 1960
  2. Gray v. . Brooklyn Heights R.R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1903
  3. Haleem v. OnateAppellate Court of Illinois · 1966
  4. Chapin v. FoegeAppellate Court of Illinois · 1938
  5. Kimmel v. HefnerAppellate Court of Illinois · 1962

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Sostock v. ReissAppellate Court of Illinois · 1980
  2. Manders v. PuliceIllinois Supreme Court · 1970
  3. Pease v. ACE HARDWARE HOME CENTER OF ROUND LAKE NO. 252cAppellate Court of Illinois · 1986
  4. Coulter v. RenshawAppellate Court of Illinois · 1981
  5. Tice v. EbelingSupreme Court of Kansas · 1986

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API