Legal Opinion

Kimmel v. Hefner

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided May 18, 1962No. Gen. 62-F-9PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtScheineman, J.

This suit involved two plaintiffs, husband and wife, both claiming damages as a result of the same collision. The jury returned a verdict for the wife in the sum of $13,000 but said nothing about the husband’s claim. The court informed them they were required to bring in two verdicts and retired them again. When they returned the second time, there was no change in the wife’s verdict, but as to the husband, the verdict read:

“We, the jury, find in favor of the plaintiff, Harvey Kimmel and against the Defendant. We assess the damages in the sum of $ No damages.”

The trial court accepted the…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Gray v. . Brooklyn Heights R.R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1903
  2. Western Springs Park District v. LawrenceIllinois Supreme Court · 1931
  3. Kinsell v. HawthorneAppellate Court of Illinois · 1960
  4. Chapin v. FoegeAppellate Court of Illinois · 1938
  5. People v. TierneyIllinois Supreme Court · 1911

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Tweedy v. Wright Ford Sales, Inc.Illinois Supreme Court · 1976
  2. Wottowa Insurance Agency, Inc. v. BockIllinois Supreme Court · 1984
  3. Kleiss v. CassidaAppellate Court of Illinois · 1998
  4. Jeffrey v. Chicago Transit AuthorityAppellate Court of Illinois · 1962
  5. Manders v. PuliceIllinois Supreme Court · 1970

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API